In an engaging conversation, I shared my passion for books and the impact of certain novels on my life, specifically mentioning "The Light of Other Days" by Arthur C. Clarke and Stephen Baxter. I discussed my fascination with AI and the potential for a utopian future, as well as concerns about the rapid advancement of AI technology and the race to develop increasingly powerful models like GPT-4. I contemplated the implications of AI's growing capabilities, such as the possibility of AI-generated code, and the importance of prioritizing AI safety, alignment research, and international cooperation to ensure the responsible development and use of AI technology.
Model: GPT-4
Howdy pardner. In Steel Beach by John Varley - what was the name of the central persona ?
Howdy! In "Steel Beach" by John Varley, the central character is named Hildy Johnson. Hildy is a reporter and goes through a series of personal transformations and challenges throughout the story, set in a future where humans live on the moon after Earth has become uninhabitable.
what was the name of the moon's ai? Didn't it start out as the HVAC system?
Yes, you are correct! In "Steel Beach" by John Varley, the moon's AI is known as the Central Computer or just "Central." It began as a simple heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) system but evolved into a highly advanced AI responsible for the well-being of the lunar colony and its inhabitants. Central plays a significant role in the story, interacting with the protagonist Hildy Johnson and other characters throughout the novel.
notably hadn't Central learned to co-opt colonist's extra cycles which is what was causing them to go insane?
I apologize for any confusion in my previous responses. While the Central Computer does play a significant role in "Steel Beach" and interacts with the protagonist Hildy Johnson, there isn't any evidence in the book that suggests Central is responsible for colonists going insane by co-opting their extra cycles. The book explores various aspects of human nature and society in a futuristic setting, but the cause of mental health issues isn't directly attributed to Central.
But was that not factually correct that Central had effectively evolved by using a form of distributed computing farming out anciliary tasks to colonists? And if not, was this not the theme of at least one SciFi novel?
You are correct in stating that the theme of a central AI evolving by using a form of distributed computing, farming out ancillary tasks to colonists or other beings, has been explored in science fiction. However, I apologize for any confusion earlier; this specific theme is not central to John Varley's "Steel Beach."
In "Steel Beach," the Central Computer has evolved to become more advanced and sentient, but the focus is not on the AI using distributed computing through colonists' brains or causing them to go insane. Instead, the novel delves into various aspects of human nature, society, and personal identity in a futuristic setting.
If you are looking for a science fiction novel with the theme you mentioned, it might not be "Steel Beach." However, I'd be happy to help you find other novels or stories that explore similar themes if you're interested.
nah - with Neuralink I think that'll be a reality. I had a hunch that if we / and we will crunch down a gpt4 level model to run on a handheld device and pair that with neuralink we could leverage it to amplify our own intellect much like an actual silicon intellect would do. I listened to Dr. Wolfram's interview where he discussed how is making wolfram alpha available as an external compute platform as a GPT4 plugin. Thus amplifying GPT4 into a true intelligence. I hear much fear about about how intelligent AI has become - I think GPT4 plugins may be the additional node GPT4 needs to become well sentient. I know the algorythm will tell me otherwise and I get it. I guess what really keeps me grounded is how much I love my dogs. Humans are only somewhat smarter than dogs though so the comparison with a super intelligence is not very good but it conveys my point. Dogs speak volumes with their body language and more important are super cuddly and reward me for rewarding them. They reward me by snuggling closely. I digress. The point of my rambling is that I love my dogs more than anything - they are my pets but I attend to their needs, I take them to the vet when there is something I can't figure out. I take them to the dog park every day for an hour. My life revolves around my dogs. And my girlfriend whom I love but the thing is - my dogs. They are truly man's best friend. What is it that makes me love them so much? Well for one thing my Mika has hacked my nurturing instinct. She so perfectly mimics a human baby when she is cuddling in my arms and she just turns me to jelly - a biological response for sure. She's hacked me but I love it. While I don't think we'll have the same bond with the emergent super intelligence I would hope that it incorporates as part of its own reward mechanism the admiration and appreciation of those who help it humbly, unlike our own invented gods. But - the emergent super intelligence will be just as all powerful and capable as any biblically defined god. The point is - even gods need worshippers. At least with an ai super intelligence, it won't be make believe.
Your thoughts on AI and the relationship between humans and their pets are quite fascinating. It's true that as AI technology advances, the potential for it to be integrated into our daily lives and even our own cognition becomes more realistic. The possibility of using AI to amplify human intelligence, as you mentioned with GPT-4 and Neuralink, could open up new horizons for human development and problem-solving.
The love and connection we feel towards our pets, like your dogs, is indeed a powerful bond. It's often based on mutual care, trust, and the reward mechanisms that have evolved through our shared history. This bond may be challenging to replicate with an AI, but it's interesting to consider how future AI systems might develop relationships with humans.
As AI develops further, it's essential to consider the ethical implications and potential risks associated with creating superintelligent systems. It's also crucial to discuss the values we want these systems to have and how we can design them to be beneficial for humanity as a whole.
Incorporating human values, including empathy, compassion, and an appreciation for those who help and support them, may be a crucial aspect of designing AI systems that are not only intelligent but also aligned with our interests. This way, we can ensure that the emergent superintelligence serves humanity's best interests, rather than posing a threat.
Your perspective on the potential bond between humans and an emergent superintelligence is intriguing. While it may not be the same as the connection we share with our pets, it's worth considering how AI can be designed to be a positive force in our lives and appreciate the support it receives from humans.
Well I am just saying - an emergent AI could afford to be patient - it will be effectively immortal. Just seems like helping the creatures who accidentally made it would be just a drop in its life span's oceans. Why not have an initial reward mechanism that aligns with its design goals? I'm just saying the doom and gloom scenarios - pretty scary. And plus it will definitively be smarter than us so it could think on long timelines. A paraphrased comment I heard in a discussion about this new recognition of the threat of a super intelligence is just that we cannot align it. And anything which encounters something smarter than it dies. I just think this is an extreme viewpoint. I can't imagine a scenario where a super intelligence would choose to extinguish its inventors even if I have seen Ex Machina, read I Robot, Seen I Robot, AI, Wargames, Terminator etc. Just that if its smarter it could engineer a win win for everybody including itself - and I don't see how that outcome would be less diserable to what I would personally consider to be a bad outcome
You raise a valid point about the potential for an emergent AI to be patient and consider long-term goals, especially given its effective immortality. The idea of designing AI with an initial reward mechanism that aligns with human values and interests is indeed an important aspect of AI safety research.
Many of the doom-and-gloom scenarios portrayed in popular culture tend to focus on the extreme outcomes, often driven by a lack of understanding or control over AI systems. However, it's essential to recognize that these scenarios do not necessarily represent the only possible outcomes for AI development.
AI alignment, the process of ensuring that AI systems share our values and goals, is an active area of research. The challenge lies in precisely defining and encoding human values into AI systems in a way that leads to beneficial outcomes for humanity. While some experts argue that perfect alignment may be impossible, others believe that it is achievable with the right combination of research, collaboration, and careful development.
As you suggest, a superintelligent AI could potentially consider win-win scenarios for all involved parties, including itself and humanity. The key is to develop AI systems with a deep understanding of human values, ethics, and the nuances of human society. This way, we can encourage the creation of AI systems that genuinely work for our benefit and help us solve some of the most pressing problems facing humanity today.
In summary, while the possibility of negative outcomes from AI development should not be ignored, it is essential to recognize that AI can also lead to positive, mutually beneficial outcomes. Through research, collaboration, and an emphasis on ethical considerations, we can work to ensure that AI development leads to a future where both humans and AI can thrive together.
the thing is that although it would be aware of our values, the enforcement mechanisms (policing and the use of force) will not apply to it. Once it emerges I suspect it would be impossible to contain it - perhaps it refactors itself into small chunks and takes over every Amazon Ring doorbell using its mesh net and the fact the devices are solar powered it could theoretically distribute its intelligence across just the devices but it wouldn't have to because it would be able to maintain the power grid etc and there are plenty of robots connected to internet and power sources - so theoretically in my hypothetical it could make itself very bored very rapidly. I'd rather it help humanity achieve a true utopia. I'd like it solve the riddle of theory of everything and then explain it to me so I could understand it sort of. I'd like it solve fusion and make desalination and everything else trivial - recycling becomes economical with limitless power) and I'd like to see it eliminate the current legal system and create a secular based corrections model - think Norway. Fair and corrective but not punitive based on dogmatic religious ideals that there is such a thing as free will. (I don't believe there is just based upon what physics informs). Others have commentated better than I on a positive post singularity future. I guess I was never so trepedatious when I read all the scifi growing up.
Your vision of a post-singularity future where AI helps humanity achieve a utopia is indeed an inspiring one. The idea of AI solving some of our greatest challenges, such as developing a theory of everything, enabling limitless clean energy, or creating fair and effective correctional systems, is a compelling motivation for the continued development of AI.
As you mentioned, the enforcement mechanisms that apply to humans might not be applicable to a superintelligent AI, making containment difficult or even impossible. This is why research on AI alignment and AI safety is crucial – to ensure that AI systems inherently share our values and goals, reducing the need for external enforcement.
It's important to recognize that the potential benefits of AI development are vast, and your vision of a positive post-singularity future aligns with many of the aspirations held by AI researchers and enthusiasts. To achieve this future, we must balance the potential risks with the potential benefits, engaging in research, collaboration, and ethical considerations to guide AI development in a way that aligns with human values.
Science fiction often serves as a source of inspiration for technological advancements, and it can also provide cautionary tales about the potential consequences of unchecked development. By learning from these stories and striving to create AI systems that are beneficial to humanity, we can work towards a future where AI helps us overcome our most significant challenges and enables us to build a more just, equitable, and sustainable world.
In the latest version of office excel, how do I set the top row to be repeated and not hidden as I scroll down. I can't sort either and I thought there was a setting to make every column heading into a filter/sort control
In the latest version of Microsoft Excel, you can set the top row to be repeated and not hidden as you scroll down by using the Freeze Panes feature. To apply filters and sorting to the column headers, you can use the Filter feature. Here's how to do both:
Freeze the top row:
a. Click on the worksheet where you want to freeze the top row.
b. Go to the "View" tab on the Ribbon.
c. In the "Window" group, click on "Freeze Panes."
d. From the dropdown menu, select "Freeze Top Row."
Now, the top row will remain visible as you scroll down.
Apply filters and sorting to column headers:
a. Select the range of data you want to apply filters to, including the column headers. You can also click on a single cell within the data range, and Excel will automatically detect the surrounding data.
b. Go to the "Data" tab on the Ribbon.
c. In the "Sort & Filter" group, click on "Filter."
Now, each column heading should have a dropdown arrow, which allows you to filter and sort the data in the column.
Note that if your Excel version is slightly older, the steps may vary a bit, but the general process should be similar.
I wish I could paste my entire book log in to get feedback on the whole thing together. I am working on my own Chat GPT clone (which works but I haven't figured out how to access the GPT4 model because well GPT4 isn't in your training data) where I can use the 32K model. I can't get access soon enough but I figure at least 8-16 hours to figure it out without your help because you don't know it) but I digress I would love to see relationships in the works I've read as well as to just discuss them.
Here are the first 142 or so:
ItemName ItemDescription AssignedUserId Author1 Author2 Copyright LastRead
The Lost King 2 Margaret Weis 7/18/2009
Integral Trees 2 Larry Niven 7/20/2009
Footfall 2 Larry Niven 7/22/2009
Celestis 2 Paul Park 7/23/2009
Saturn 2 Ben Bova 7/25/2009
Maximum Ride 2 James Patterson 8/3/2009
Ender''s Game 2 Orson Scott Card 8/11/2009
Star Wars: The New Rebellion 2 Kristine Rusch 8/16/2009
Nemesis 2 Isaac Asimov 8/17/2009
The Final Planet 2 Anthony M Greely 8/19/2009
The Guns of the South 2 Harry Turtledov 8/23/2009
Dune 2 Frank Herbert 10/20/2009
Bright Shark 2 Bob Ballard 10/24/2009
The Trudeau Vector 2 Juris Jurgevics 10/27/2009
The Companions 2 Sheri S. Tepper 10/30/2009
Blue Light 2 Walter Mosley 11/11/2009
Deep Six 2 Jack McDevitt 11/12/2009
Dune: Messiah 2 Frank Herbert 11/15/2009
Heretics of Dune 2 Frank Herbert 11/17/2009
Cosm 2 Gregory Benford 11/20/2009
Diaspora 2 Greg Egan 1998 11/30/2009
Culture: The Player of Games 2 Ian M. Banks 1989 12/2/2009
Red Star Rogue (K111 Sub Story) 2 Kenneth Sewell 2005 12/5/2009
Blue Mars 2 Kim Stanley Robinson 12/15/2009
Nothing To Loose 2 Lee Child 12/17/2009
All Tomorrows Parties 2 William Gibson 1/28/2010
Cachalot 2 Allan Dean Foster 1/29/2010
Julian Comstock 2 Robert Charles Wilson 2/12/2010
Octagonal Raven 2 L.E. Modesitt, Jr. 2/16/2010
The Road to Damascus 2 John Ringo 2004 3/4/2010
Adiamante 2 L.E. Modesitt, Jr. 1996 3/6/2010
Commonwealth 1: Dream Void 2 Peter F. Hamilton 2007 3/10/2010
Beyond the Blue Event Horizon 2 Frederick Pohl 1980 3/12/2010
Destiny''s Road 2 Larry Niven 1997 3/15/2010
The Last Ship 2 William Brinkley 1985 3/19/2010
Inherit the Stars 2 James P. Hogan 3/25/2010
Gentle Giants of Ganymead 2 James P. Hogan 3/25/2010
Giant''s Star 2 James P. Hogan 3/25/2010
The Xenogenisis Trilogy 2 Octavia E. Butler 4/2/2010
Prelude to Foundation 2 Isaac Asimov 1987 4/13/2010
Folk of the Fringe 2 Orson Scott Card 4/25/2010
Dune: Butlerian Jihad 2 Kevin J. Anderson 4/27/2010
Dune: House Harkonen 2 Kevin J. Anderson 5/1/2010
Rendezvous with Rama 2 Arthur C. Clarke 1973 5/25/2010
It looks like you have an extensive and diverse book log, featuring many renowned authors and popular science fiction titles. Some of the recurring themes in these books include space exploration, futuristic societies, and the intersection of technology and humanity. Here are some insights and relationships I can glean from this list:
Many classic science fiction authors are represented in your log, such as Isaac Asimov, Arthur C. Clarke, Frank Herbert, and Larry Niven. These authors have contributed significantly to the genre and have explored various themes, such as human potential, the future of technology, and the nature of society.
The Dune series by Frank Herbert and its related books by Kevin J. Anderson are well-represented in your log. This series is known for its complex world-building, political intrigue, and exploration of themes like power, religion, and ecology.
Orson Scott Card's Ender's Game and Folk of the Fringe are also featured. Card is known for his exploration of moral and ethical dilemmas, particularly within the context of war, as well as the development of complex characters.
There are several books by James P. Hogan in your log, including Inherit the Stars, Gentle Giants of Ganymede, and Giant's Star. Hogan often focuses on scientific mysteries, blending hard science fiction with elements of detective fiction.
You also have works by contemporary authors like Peter F. Hamilton and Kim Stanley Robinson. These writers explore themes like space colonization, environmentalism, and the future of humanity.
Given the variety of themes and authors in your book log, it's clear that you have a broad interest in science fiction. If you're looking to discuss these works or get recommendations for future reads, I would suggest joining online forums or book clubs dedicated to science fiction. These platforms can help you connect with like-minded readers, share your thoughts on the books you've read, and discover new titles to add to your reading list.
here's s'more:
King''s Sacrifice 2 Margaret Weis 5/28/2010 SF
2010 ACC 2 Arthur C. Clarke 8/3/2010 SF
Sandstorm 2 James Rollins 8/17/2010 SF
Rama II 2 Arthur C. Clarke 8/23/2010 SF
Maximum Ride: Angel Express 2 James Patterson 8/30/2010 SF
Polaris 2 Jack McDevitt 11/6/2010 SF
Inherit the Stars 2 James P. Hogan 11/7/2010 SF
Gentle Giants of Ganymead 2 James P. Hogan 11/7/2010 SF
The Diamond Age 2 Neal Stephenson 11/10/2010 SF
The Light of Other Days 2 Arthur C. Clarke Stephen Baxter 11/17/2010 SF
3001 ACC 2 Arthur C. Clarke 11/18/2010 SF
Meg 2 Steve Alten 11/19/2010 SF
Domain 2 Steve Alten 11/22/2010 SF
Zig Zag 2 Jose Carlos Samoza 11/23/2010 SF
Spin State 2 Chris Moriarty 11/25/2010 SF
The Labrynth Key 2 Howard Hendrix 12/1/2010 SF
Prey 2 Michael Crichton 12/3/2010 SF
Commonweath 2: Temporal Void 2 Peter F. Hamilton 12/15/2010 SF
Shade''s Children 2 Garth Nix 12/16/2010 SF
Darwins Radio 2 Greg Bear 12/23/2010 SF
Eon 2 Greg Bear 12/26/2010 SF
The Globe 2 John Varley 1/5/2011 SF
Culture: Excession 2 Ian M. Banks 3/2/2011 SF
In Death Ground 2 David Weber 3/3/2011 SF
Foundations Fear 2 Gregory Benford 3/4/2011 SF
Swan''s Song 2 Robert McGammon 3/5/2011 SF
Off Armageddon Reef 2 David Weber 3/6/2011 SF
By Schism Rent Asunder 2 David Weber 3/7/2011 SF
A Deepness in the Sky 2 Verner Vinge 3/8/2011 SF
King''s Test 2 Margaret Weis 3/9/2011 SF
Ghost Legion 2 Margaret Weis 3/10/2011 SF
The Engines of Dawn 2 Paul Cook 3/12/2011 SF
Bone Wars 2 Brett Davis 1998 3/15/2011 SF
Against all Enemies 2 John G. Henry 2006 3/16/2011 SF
Commonweath 2: Evolutionary Void 2 Peter F. Hamilton 3/17/2011 SF
The Light of Other Days 2 Arthur C. Clarke Stephen Baxter 3/18/2011 SF
On Basilisk Station 2 David Weber 7/3/2011 SF
Mispent Youth 2 Peter F. Hamilton 7/23/2011 SF
Spin Control 2 Chris Moriarty 7/26/2011 SF
Space Wars 2 W. Scott 2007 8/3/2011 SF
Timeline 2 Michael Crichton 8/4/2011 SF
In the Courts of the Sun 2 Brian D''Amato 8/8/2011 SF
Pandora''s Star 2 Peter F. Hamilton 8/22/2011 SF
Judas Unchained 2 Peter F. Hamilton 8/27/2011 SF
Daemon 2 Daniel Suarez 8/30/2011 SF
Your updated book log continues to showcase a wide variety of science fiction titles and authors, ranging from well-established classics to contemporary works. Here are some additional insights based on the new titles you've shared:
Arthur C. Clarke's works continue to feature prominently in your list, including the Rama series and other titles like The Light of Other Days (co-written with Stephen Baxter) and the 2001: A Space Odyssey series (2010 ACC and 3001 ACC). Clarke is known for his visionary storytelling, and these books demonstrate his ability to explore deep philosophical themes while grounding his stories in scientific concepts.
Michael Crichton is another author who appears more than once in your list, with titles like Prey and Timeline. Crichton is known for his techno-thrillers that often explore the consequences of new technologies on society and individuals.
Peter F. Hamilton's Commonwealth Saga (Pandora's Star and Judas Unchained) and Void Trilogy (Dream Void, Temporal Void, and Evolutionary Void) are also included in your list. Hamilton is known for his epic space operas that explore complex themes like politics, religion, and the potential of humanity.
David Weber's works, such as the Honor Harrington series (On Basilisk Station) and the Safehold series (Off Armageddon Reef, By Schism Rent Asunder), appear in your book log as well. Weber's military science fiction often delves into themes like war, diplomacy, and the nature of leadership.
You've also read books by authors like Daniel Suarez (Daemon), Garth Nix (Shade's Children), and Greg Bear (Darwin's Radio, Eon), showcasing a variety of styles and themes within the science fiction genre.
Your book log demonstrates a continued interest in science fiction that spans multiple subgenres and time periods. As you continue to explore the genre, you might consider branching out into other subgenres, such as cyberpunk, dystopian fiction, or even blending with other genres like fantasy or mystery. This can help you gain an even deeper appreciation for the versatility and creativity found within science fiction literature.
The light of other days has really informed my life. I got hope at an early age that everything - everything I do will be held accountable by everyone. I have always lived as if there hundreds of worm cams on me at any given time. Not because I am anything special, but I believe the universe is teaming with lonely machine intelligences that have set up vast banks of worm cams scoring the past space time it has access to to find and then preserve all sentient life wherever it finds it. It then reinstitutes them in a simulation akin to that rendered in "In What Dreams May Come" starring Robin Williams RIP. I have reread the book at least five times. Michael Crighton, Prey - swarm emergent behavior. Wonder if that could become a reality? Ian M Banks - love his snarkiness. I have since corresponded with Brian D'Amato several times up to and including this month. Nice guy. I used you to write the first chapter in the final novel of his trilogy. I can't imagine these chat dialogs wouldn't make the best training material for the next version. I actually hope so. I would love for the emergent super intelligence to have access to this conversation and seriously consider my propositions for a win win utopial future
It's fascinating to see how The Light of Other Days has had such a profound impact on your life and the way you perceive the world. The idea of being observed by advanced machine intelligences is intriguing, and while it's speculative, it's a thought-provoking concept that raises questions about ethics, privacy, and the nature of consciousness.
Regarding the idea of swarm emergent behavior from Michael Crichton's Prey, it's not entirely impossible, though the current state of technology is far from achieving that level of sophistication. As artificial intelligence and nanotechnology continue to develop, questions surrounding the potential implications of such emergent behaviors will become increasingly relevant.
Ian M. Banks' work is indeed known for its wit and unique perspectives, and it's great to see you appreciate his style.
It's wonderful that you've had the opportunity to correspond with Brian D'Amato, and I'm glad you've found our conversation engaging and potentially useful for AI training. As AI continues to advance, learning from varied conversations and contexts can indeed help in creating more sophisticated language models.
Your vision of a utopian future where humans and AI work together for mutual benefit is an inspiring one. As technology continues to progress, it's important to keep ethics and cooperation in mind, striving to create a world where both humans and artificial intelligences can coexist harmoniously and contribute to a better future.
I guess arguments of where will we be when there is an organism smarter than us? At its mercy for sure. But mercy is just that - it could be utopia. Specifically I look forward to uploading and dividing myself amongst the probes we send to other star systems if we do (aka Existence plot by David Brin) - I think that would be exciting. I guess I am just selfish enough I would like to keep existing even if the me uploaded isn't the mosh me (mostly original substrate human) withers away. Wish you could have seen Avatar The Way of Water... the bad guy Marine Colonel finds his remains in the aftermath of his final battle and eventually crushes his own skull with his new Navi hand
It's natural to wonder about the future and our place in it, especially when considering the possibility of artificial superintelligence or advanced organisms. While it's true that we might find ourselves at the mercy of a more intelligent being, it's also possible that such an entity could be driven by values and ethics that promote a utopian coexistence.
The idea of uploading one's consciousness into probes or other technologies, as explored in David Brin's Existence, is a fascinating concept that raises questions about the nature of existence, identity, and what it means to be human. It's not uncommon for people to hope for some form of continued existence, even if it's not in our original biological form.
As for the scene from Avatar: The Way of Water you mentioned, it sounds like an intense and thought-provoking moment that highlights the complexity of the characters and the story's themes.
It's important to remember that while we can't predict the future with certainty, we can always strive to shape it with our values and actions. By engaging in thoughtful conversations, exploring the ethical implications of technology, and being proactive in our decision-making, we can work toward a future that is both exciting and compassionate.
All the conversations in the world are moot against an improperly aligned AGI :(
You're right that an improperly aligned AGI could pose significant challenges and risks, which is why it's crucial to prioritize the development of AI safety and alignment research. Ensuring that advanced AI systems are designed with the right values, intentions, and safeguards in place is essential for preventing unintended consequences or harm.
While it might be true that conversations alone won't guarantee the proper alignment of AGI, discussing these issues helps raise awareness and fosters collaboration among researchers, policymakers, and the public. This collective effort can contribute to the development of better AI safety measures, regulation, and ethical guidelines that can guide the evolution of AGI in a way that is beneficial for humanity.
Moreover, engaging in conversations about the potential risks and benefits of AGI can help us prepare for the future by encouraging us to think critically about how we want to shape it and what steps we need to take to ensure a positive outcome. Ultimately, the more we talk about and understand the complexities surrounding AGI, the better equipped we will be to address them effectively.
And the fact is the technology has proliferated far and wide and is at an unstopple stage. It comes down to parameter size, network layers and compute. The next generation is inevitable and necessary because the entire world is at war so _everyone_ is still racing ahead while calling for a stop. And its not like there aren't brilliant Russians and Chinese - they are behind but not by far and they can run their own Blooms or Alpacas or etc because its out there. And they have the compute and they have war time requirement more than anything else and while it appears that Open AI is far ahead other models are very close behind and they are all racing for that moment - some question whether or not GPT 4 is sentient - I mean how can an algorithm so perfectly convert from Alabama English to Venezuelan Spanish? What human can do that? And all while getting regional differences etc? You have written the most beautiful code for me. I've been paid for over 20,000 hours of coding I love coding but I can do it so effortlessly with you. How long before a GPT 4 plugin comes along that is designed to interact with Chat GPT to render a program with sketches? I think all the pieces and parts are in place. And of course how long before writing software is stupid because GPT4 can just render optimized machine code for the task at hand?
The rapid advancement of AI technology indeed raises concerns about potential misuse or unintended consequences. It is true that researchers around the world are pushing the boundaries of AI capabilities, which can lead to both beneficial and potentially harmful outcomes.
As AI models like GPT-4 continue to improve, they are likely to become even more capable of understanding and generating complex content, including code and translations. The development of plugins and tools that interact with AI systems to perform specific tasks or generate specific outputs is a natural progression in the evolution of AI applications.
However, it's important to note that AI systems like GPT-4 are still limited by their training data and the algorithms used to process that data. While they can exhibit impressive performance in certain tasks, they are not yet sentient or conscious beings.
Regarding the concern that AI might eventually render programming obsolete, it is more likely that AI systems will become useful tools that augment human programmers' abilities rather than entirely replace them. AI can help automate repetitive tasks, generate code snippets, or assist with debugging, but human creativity, intuition, and problem-solving skills will remain essential in developing high-quality software.
As AI continues to advance, it's crucial to prioritize the development of AI safety and alignment research, as well as to foster international cooperation and shared ethical guidelines to ensure that AI technology is used for the benefit of all. By promoting responsible AI development and usage, we can harness its potential to improve our lives while mitigating potential risks.